|
Comments
|
Today's Top SOA Links
Case Study Case Study: Content Management System vs. Wiki for Community Websites
Why JBoss.org chose an open source CMS
By: Boris Kraft
Dec. 30, 2008 07:00 AM
Wikis are a great software tool for collaboratively creating and editing content. They seem to be an obvious choice for building a community Web infrastructure. Yet they have serious drawbacks that made JBoss.org choose a Content Management System (CMS) instead of a Wiki to build its new community website. Managing Content of High-Traffic Community Sites JBoss.org currently uses an in-house system they developed, but wanted to focus on adding value for the more than 40 software projects it hosts, instead of maintaining a self-made CMS. Initially in April 2008, JBoss.org evaluated Wikis when starting to look for a solution, but soon discovered that a CMS offers more advantages than a conventional Wiki. Since its infrastructure is Java-based and open source, the natural desire was to use an open source, Java-based content management system. That is when JBoss.org started to try out Magnolia, which is both easily integrated into their Java infrastructure and open source. Reusable Content Is Hard to Achieve with Wikis That's where JBoss.org saw a CMS like Magnolia really helping out. It allows for a new community website that can be more flexible, comprehensive and rich, because it can reuse content from all over the site. Benefits of Typed Information That content bit can be retrieved dynamically and displayed to website visitors in different places on the website. For example, the front page of a website would only display the title and teaser of a PR message together with a link to the complete press release. That press release page then shows the whole information, including the PR title, teaser, body, and press contact information. Templates for Content Inclusion and Formatting In a similar fashion, templates can display the same information in different ways. For example, on a front page, you want a PR teaser to be formatted in normal style, while you want it to be in bold style when viewing the press release in its entirety. That could be achieved through different templates. For example, one displays the teaser text in normal style, while another template can display the teaser text in bold style. Templates can also be configured to give users the ability to easily influence the design of their page or micro-site. While this can be also true for some Wiki systems, the template concept is a much more fundamental part of Magnolia. Business Benefits of a CMS Content reusability ensures a faster time-to-publishing and reduced manual work. Instead of copy and paste, content can be included dynamically. This minimizes errors that can happen when manually transferring content. Reusable templates make the life of website developers and administrators easier and save time, while enabling customization for an individual look & feel for micro-sites of a community portal. For example, on the new JBoss.org community website, projects like "Hibernate" or "Seam" wish to keep a "corporate" identity that supports their branding and differs from the main JBoss.org design. Even though projects are managed by the same CMS installation, each project can have its own area look different from the others if desired. In sum, JBoss.org found that the CMS in comparison with the conventional Wiki fostered better identification for individuals within their community, as well as richer information delivered and greater customization in the visual appearance. These benefits lead to a vibrant and growing community and that is why JBoss.org chose Magnolia CMS for its new community Web infrastructure. References Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1
Your Feedback
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
|
SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
Most Read This Week |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||